Thursday, January 30, 2025
Selden, free throws lead Gardner-Webb past Longwood
Winthrop locks in late, turns away pesky Presbyterian
ROCK HILL, S.C. – Just under three-and-a-half minutes
remained on the clock. Winthrop’s Paul Jones tried a layup. Presbyterian’s
Jaylen Peterson rejected the try. The ball fell into the hands of Winthrop star
Kelton Talford, who went back up to attempt a putback. Peterson tried to
contest the shot and was assessed a personal foul. Almost immediately
thereafter, he was also given a Class A technical foul.
Winthrop proceeded to knock down three of the four free
throw tries it was awarded. The Eagles capitalized on the opportunity,
closing the game on a 14-5 run and claiming a 76-67 victory before an announced
crowd of 1,884 at Winthrop Coliseum Wednesday night.
Presbyterian coach Quinton Ferrell took a long time to
gather his thoughts, then talked to his team after the game. Though it is tough
to argue that a single play could change a game, Ferrell was struggling to
understand why the play happened and how to convey what he was told about the
foul.
“(Peterson) jumped really high is what he said,” Ferrell
said. “They told me that another block that he had was a block, but it was a
dangerous play. That part’s unfortunate, but in games, you’re going to have
stuff that you can’t control. That’s why we needed to be better on defense.”
“That was a huge shift in the game. It was a tie game. We
blocked the ball and got possession of it. We came out of that situation down
three, so we were kind of fighting uphill through adversity. We’ll get better
from it.”
“There’s a million plays throughout the course of a game,”
Winthrop coach Mark Prosser said. “It’s not one play. It’s not one moment in
that game decides the end. It’s sort of the culmination of everything. It was a
tie game and we got to go to the line. (Guard) Kasen (Harrison) stepping up
there and making one and KT stepping up there and making two changed the
complexion (of the game) in some ways.”
Winthrop (14-9, 4-4 Big South) took control of the game
early. The Eagles scored 11 of the game’s first 14 points, getting early boosts
from Talford and guard Ryan Jolly . Winthrop enjoyed its biggest lead of the
first half at eight points on a pair of occasions before the visitors launched
a charge. Presbyterian (9-14, 2-6) used a 17-9 run over the next
eight-and-a-half minutes to level the score at 27 with 1:49 remaining in the
first half. Five Blue Hose scorers contributed to the burst.
Winthrop then closed the half on a 5-0 stretch, using a
Jones three-pointer and pair of free throws from forward K.J. Doucet to take a
32-27 lead to the interval.
Presbyterian persisted, though, despite trailing by as many
as seven almost immediately into the second half. The Blue Hose chipped away,
thinning the Eagle lead to as few as three points and finding themselves on the
precipice of tying the game or going ahead. They never managed to do so until a
key sequence with around nine minutes remaining in the second half.
Winthrop led by seven after a pair of Talford free throws.
Kobe Stewart converted a layup for Presbyterian, then Kory Mincy made a layup
of his own. Following a 30-second Winthrop stoppage, the game remained
scoreless for the next minute and a half. Mincy then converted a pair of free
throws, then finally gave his side the lead on the ensuing possession with a
three-pointer following an offensive rebound.
The home side would seize back the lead with a 5-0 burst,
only for Carl Parrish to hit an equalizing three-pointer for Presbyterian with
4:59 remaining. Nick Johnson again evened the score on a pair of free throws,
only for Triston Wilson to give the advantage back to the Blue Hose on a pair
from the stripe. Kasen Harrison then evened up the game again on a runner, only
for the sequence between Jones, Talford, and Peterson to unfold.
Ferrell stopped short of citing the sequence as the lone key
to the result, but it did highlight a recurring theme for the Blue Hose.
Presbyterian has found itself in several close games – especially in Big South
play – only for the team not to close the way it hoped. The Blue Hose leader
commented after the game on those late-game concerns.
“Pretty much all our league games that we’ve lost in the
(last four minutes) in the second half, we’ve either been tied or it’s been a
one-possession game. We’ve just struggled to get stops to close out the game,”
Ferrell said. “It’s what we’ve been emphasizing and talking about a lot. Most
teams in the last three minutes are not doing anything new that they haven’t
been doing in the first 36, 37 minutes of the game.”
“I don’t know what it is with our guys when we get in those
situations, in terms of executing our rotations and things of that nature.
We’ve got to figure out a way to do what we did from the eight-minute mark to
the 3:30 mark, because we were down seven and we took the lead. In that
stretch, we were getting stops. They were running the same things. We just
needed to guard the ball better. The difference in the game was the free
throws, in terms of how many free throws they made compared to us.”
To Ferrell’s point, the Eagles attempted double the amount
of free throws as did the Blue Hose. Winthrop also sank nine more tries from
the line, hitting 19-of-26 to the Blue Hose’s 10-of-13.
Talford bounced back with a strong effort following limited
minutes due to foul trouble in Saturday’s game at High Point. The senior logged
another of his many double-doubles, scoring 25 points and snaring 10 caroms. 17
of those points and six of the boards came in the closing 20 minutes.
“We just needed that to get back into the groove of things,”
Talford said. “They’ve got a good coach and good guys on their team. You could
tell they planned for us.”
“The look in his eyes the last couple of days has been
different,” Prosser said of Talford. “There’s a pride level in this program. He
has put his blood, sweat, and tears in this uniform. He’s very proud of what
this program’s about. He was terrific today.”
Doucet and Johnson added 12 and 10, respectively, for the
Eagles. Winthrop shot 46.4 percent (26-for-56), despite hitting just 5-of-20
(25 percent) from distance. Center Logan Duncomb also offered a strong
performance in reserve duty, scoring eight points and snatching five misses in
just over eight minutes of play.
Mincy paced the Blue Hose, booking 20 points on 6-of-16 from
the field. Stewart logged his second double-double of the 2024-25 campaign,
registering 12 points and 10 boards. Peterson and Carl Parrish provided big
games off the bench, with Peterson scoring nine, grabbing five boards, and
swatting away six shots. The blocked shot total matched the highest in Big
South play this season. Parrish scored 13 in 25 minutes of play, hitting 5-of-8
from the field (3-of-6 from distance).
“We’ve got a lot of confidence in the guys that come off our
bench,” Ferrell said. “All of those guys have had big games already in
conference. They’re all young guys, too.”
Both teams return to conference play at home Saturday
afternoon. Presbyterian welcomes second-place High Point to the Templeton
Center in Clinton, S.C. Winthrop hosts rival Gardner-Webb. Both games are set
for 2:00 (Eastern) starts, with streaming coverage over ESPN+.
WINTHROP 76, PRESBYTERIAN 67
PRESBYTERIAN (9-14, 2-6 BIG SOUTH)
King 1-5 0-1 2, Stewart 5-14 1-2 12, Mincy 6-16 6-6 20,
Harvey 2-7 0-0 5, Scott 1-2 0-0 2, Wilson 1-3 2-2 4, Pettaway 0-2 0-0 0,
Parrish 5-8 0-0 13, Peterson 4-6 1-2 9. Totals 25-63 10-13 67.
WINTHROP (14-9, 4-4)
Jolly 2-6 0-0 5, Talford 9-13 7-7 25, Johnson 3-8 3-6 10,
Harrison 1-3 3-4 5, Doucet 4-8 4-6 12, Wilson 1-1 0-1 3, Jones 1-5 0-0 3,
Diallo 0-0 0-0 0, Kamarad 1-3 0-0 2, Hamilton 0-1 0-0 0, Duncomb 3-5 2-2 8,
Baker 1-3 0-0 3. Totals 26-56 19-26 76.
Halftime: Winthrop 32-27u. 3-Point
goals: Presbyterian 7-24 (King 0-2, Stewart 1-6, Mincy 2-4, Harvey
1-5, Pettaway 0-1, Parrish 3-6), Winthrop 5-20 (Jolly 1-4, Johnson 1-4,
Harrison 0-1, Doucet 0-2, Wilson 1-1, Jones 1-3, Kamarad 0-2, Baker 1-3). Fouled
out: Peterson (PC). Rebounds: Winthrop
42 (Talford 10), Presbyterian 33 (Stewart 10). Total fouls: Presbyterian
23, Winthrop 15. Technicals: Bench (WU), Peterson (PC).
Points off turnovers: Presbyterian 11, Winthrop
7. Points in the paint: Winthrop 42, Presbyterian 32. Second-chance
points: Winthrop 15, Presbyterian 12. Fast-break
points: Winthrop 13, Presbyterian 10. Bench
points: Presbyterian 26, Winthrop 19.
Wednesday, January 29, 2025
UConn closes January on positive note, prepares for February gauntlet
By Connor Wilson (@Conman_815)
HARTFORD, Conn. — The month of January has fared in completely different directions for Dan Hurley and his UConn Huskies over the past two years.
In 2022-23, after starting 15-1 in the season’s first two months, the team mustered off a 3-6 start to 2023 before finishing 13-1 and eventually hoisting the national championship trophy. The next year featured an historic Huskies squad that went 8-0 in the first month of 2024 en route to the program’s second straight title. Two completely different January journeys, but both ended in the same result in April.
This year’s rendition of January UConn finished somewhere in the middle of that. Not close to the perfect 8-0 last year’s team pulled off, but also nowhere near the complete collapse that 2023 featured. There were highs. There were lows.
The month started out very sour for the Huskies, even in a convincing road victory at Wintrust Arena against DePaul. In the win, star freshman Liam McNeeley twisted his ankle and had to depart. That game against the Blue Demons would end up being the only one he played the entire month of January as he rehabbed from a sprained ankle.
Outside of that win at Wintrust, each of the other seven games in the middle provided its own unique challenges. In a home win over Providence, the Huskies trailed by as many as 14 and needed a ferocious second half comeback to pull off the win. The road loss to Villanova followed with the now-infamous Alex Karaban missed free throws. Then, it looked like both Karaban and the team had turned a corner and put that tough loss behind them when they defeated Georgetown on the road.
“They’re used to dominance,” Hurley said of his team’s adjustment to playing all these close games.
Unfortunately, the rough patch was only starting. One week after the Georgetown win, UConn lost its first home game in nearly two full years when Creighton came to Storrs and defeated the Huskies. A mere three days later, it took overtime to defeat a Butler team who was 1-7 in Big East play after leading by as many as 15 in regulation. Lastly, after narrowly pulling off an overtime win before Christmas, Xavier got the best of the Huskies in round two at the Cintas Center last Saturday to close a 3-3 stretch without McNeeley going into Wednesday.
“If we’re able to get Liam on the court again, when he was on the court, we were playing at a Top 12 level,” Hurley said. “We need him out there.”
The final game, and one to potentially either salvage or ruin the month, was shaping to be the latter. Hosting DePaul, who came into the game 1-9 in Big East play, seemed like an easy test to end the month on a high note. That’s what everyone thought until the Blue Demons jumped out to a double-digit lead in the blink of an eye, and maintained it for most of the first half.
“Credit to DePaul. We get everyone’s best effort. I guess we’ve earned that,” Hurley said. “We get the best version of everyone every time we step on the court.”
Surely that’s not how this movie that is the month of January ends, right? As I said, it wasn’t full 2023 collapse level. UConn outscored DePaul by 19 in the second half on the way to a comfortable looking 72-61 victory. Four Huskies finished in double figures, with Solo Ball and Tarris Reed, Jr. leading the way with 16, while Jaylin Stewart chipped in 15.
“A big part of our turnaround was all the coaches getting on us and continuing to believe in us,” Ball said.
“Coach was on us hard at halftime, but rightfully so,” Reed added. “We weren’t playing to our capabilities. We knew what we needed to do coming out of the locker room into the second half.”
So, with the win against DePaul, UConn finishes what many considered would be an easy January at 5-3, easy in comparison to the Marquette-St.John’s-Creighton gauntlet to start February. If you were to ask Hurley how he’d assess the past 29 days?
“If we can get consistency from some of our guys and this kid (McNeeley) returns, I think we’ve got a chance to get things rolling again,” he said.
That’s probably the best way to look at it if you’re Hurley, with a glass half-full mentality. From being ranked in the Top 10 to being on the verge of being unranked and falling multiple seed lines in bracketologies in just a couple of weeks, it can be challenging to keep a positive mindset. But you just have to in order to have success or get back to where you were the past two seasons.
As long as Dan Hurley is the man in charge, UConn is never going to go away. They may have less than ideal January stretches from time to time, but as we saw two years ago, the Huskies bounced back.
“While I’m getting crushed by all types of people in the national media, the UConn fans have had my back,” Hurley said. “They’ve been loyal to me, and I’ve returned it right back. That’s why I’ll never coach basketball at another place unless you guys don’t want me here anymore.”
Can this 2025 team pull a 2023 February-type bounceback? We’re about to find out.
Tuesday, January 28, 2025
4 Thoughts: Seton Hall dealt heartbreak again in loss to Providence
Sha Sounds Off: Providence
Sunday, January 26, 2025
Seton Hall’s transition game steals win for Pirates against St. John’s
Inside the Numbers: Charleston at Elon
ELON, N.C. – Elon coach Billy Taylor described
Saturday’s contest against Charleston as “our first real stinker” after the
game. There were many areas to which one could point in making this diagnosis.
We’ll expand a bit on that diagnosis now, and we’ll do so…Inside
the Numbers!
- The easiest issue to diagnose comes on the boards. Charleston compiled an absolutely dizzying 19 offensive boards and 27 second-chance points, which led to the Cougars answering every attempt at a Phoenix run. Charleston also tallied 48 points in the paint, which neutralized the Phoenix duo of Sam Sherry and Matthew Van Komen.
“We got beat on the boards badly,” Taylor said. “We didn’t take care of the basketball and you can’t do that against good teams in this league.”
“I just think we weren’t in the correct positions,” Sherry added. “I could have been better on the boards, obviously.”
Charleston’s sports information department also noted that Elon was sixth in the nation in rebounds per game coming into the contest, only for the Cougars to outrebound the Phoenix by seven.
- More to Taylor’s point, turnovers also helped tell the tale.
Charleston committed just six miscues on the night, while Elon more than
doubled that number in finishing with 13. The Cougars converted those 13
turnovers into 22 points, while Elon capitalized with just eight points in that
category. The Phoenix finished upside down in the assist-to-turnover numbers,
helping on just eight of 23 baskets.
- Elon also struggled in transition, scoring just one point on
the break. Charleston, conversely, notched 10 fast-break points, helping to
further illustrate the chasm between the sides.
- As much as Elon struggled in the second half, the tide really turned at about the 6:16 mark of the first half. Nick Dorn sank a triple to give Elon a 24-22 lead. The Phoenix would make just two more buckets in that final six-plus minutes, though, with both coming from TK Simpkins. The Cougars closed on a 13-5 run, with nine points coming consecutively to flip a one-point Elon lead into an eight-point Charleston advantage. Though Elon trailed by just six at the interval, the Phoenix would never again be within two possessions.
“We just did not play well tonight,” Taylor said. “We didn’t play particularly well against Monmouth. We talked about that and we knew that. I was hoping that we would come out and play with a sense of urgency and some excitement, but we just weren’t able to execute the gameplan the way that we needed to at a high enough level against a really good team.”
- Elon had an inexplicable second half. The Phoenix were 10-for-15 from two-point range in the period – and 40.7 percent overall – but just 1-for-12 from three in the stanza. Charleston did not fare much better, hitting just 1-of-8 from deep in the second 20. Charleston was 16-of-20 from inside the arc in the period, making it virtually impossible for Elon to catch up once they went through the icy stretch to end the first.
Taylor summed up the night and the mood as the Phoenix
prepare for a visit from Hofstra Thursday night.
“This is really the first real stinker that we’ve had,”
Taylor said. “We're a good basketball team. We've shown that over the course of
the 20 games. We're not going to let one game define our season. We've got two
more home games next weekend. It's our job to take care of our home floor and
to come back and compete and be physically and mentally ready to go. Our guys
will be ready.”
CHARLESTON 76, ELON 62
CHARLESTON (16-5, 6-2 CAA)
Brzovic 9-14 0-0 18, Djokovic 4-11 5-11 13, Smith 9-20 1-2
20, Boyd 4-11 0-1 10, Fulton 1-3 2-2 5, Stonkus 1-3 0-0 2, Curcic 0-1 0-0 0,
Jones 4-4 0-0 8. Totals 32-67 8-16 76.
ELON (14-7, 4-3)
Sherry 7-14 0-0 15, Van Komen 2-3 0-0 4, Dorn 3-13 6-7 15, TK
Simpkins 7-12 5-7 20, King 1-2 0-0 2, TJ Simpkins 0-7 0-0 0, Campbell 0-0 0-0
0, Crump 3-4 0-1 6, Harrell 0-0 0-0 0 . Totals 23-55 11-15 62.
Halftime: Charleston 35-29. 3-Point
goals: Elon 5-18 (Sherry 1-4, Dorn 3-12, TK Simpkins 1-1, Crump
0-1), Charleston 4-21 (Brzovic 0-2, Djokovic 0-2, Smith 1-6, Boyd 2-6, Fulton
1-3, Stonkus 0-1, Curcic 0-1). Fouled out: NA. Rebounds: Charleston 40 (Brzovic
12), Elon 33 (Sherry 7). Total fouls: Charleston 13, Elon 12.
Technicals: NA.
Points off turnovers: Charleston 22, Elon 8. Points
in the paint: Charleston 48, Elon 34. Second-chance
points: Charleston 27, Elon 13. Fast-break
points: Charleston 10, Elon 1. Bench points: Charleston
10, Elon 6.
Saturday, January 25, 2025
Inside the Numbers: Winthrop at High Point
HIGH POINT, N.C. – High Point continued its sizzling
play on its home deck Saturday afternoon, turning away Winthrop, 84-62. There
are plenty of numbers to break down – we’ll do that in due time – but the
telling part came from Winthrop coach Mark Prosser’s postgame remarks.
“It’s not a tough talk,” Prosser said. “I think – we have a
lot of pride in that locker room, so there’s not a lot that needs to be said in
there. It was a – we had a couple looks early that didn’t go down. They made
plays in the first half. They had guys coming off the bench burying threes.
Their bench was 6-for-12 from three. I think that’s a huge boost.
“When you’re sort of easy to play against, in some ways – you
give a comfort level, and they obviously got comfortable very early. We got
frustrated and we didn’t run our offense the way we typically run it. When that
happens, you become stagnant and easy to guard. The ball stuck too much.”
Now that you know all that, let’s go…Inside the Numbers.
- 13:53 is the number on which to focus. Winthrop forward Kelton Talford was assessed his second foul at this mark in the first half, and the Eagles looked rudderless without him. Winthrop started the game okay on its first possession, as Nick Johnson sank a corner triple. That early success vanished, though, as the Eagles hit just two of their next 10 tries. It got progressively worse from there, as Talford was limited to just 24 minutes of play. He was only – such as it is – minus-11 on the day, which was the second-best among Eagle starters behind KJ Doucet’s minus-7.
- Talford’s absence notwithstanding, the Panthers enjoyed a significant advantage on the glass. High Point pulled down 47 caroms – 12 offensive – and converted those bounces into 19 second-chance points. The Eagles were limited to just six such points, as they only boarded six of their 34 misses. High Point center Juslin Bodo Bodo gobbled up 12 of those misses, with six other Panthers getting three or more each.
- To Prosser’s earlier point about the ball sticking, consider this: Winthrop ended up at just .911 points per possession for the game, which was a significant improvement over its first-half total. The Eagles logged just .735 points per trip in the first half, leading them to trail the Panthers by 22 at the interval. Winthrop assisted on 10 of its 19 made baskets (55.6 percent), which was actually an improvement from its first-half rate of 37.5 percent (3-of-8).
- To another of Prosser’s points, the bench players “burying threes” were also significant. Abdoulaye Thiam logged 11 points, including 3-of-4 from distance. Terry Anderson added another pair, while Simon Hildebrandt halved his two three-point attempts. The Panthers outscored Winthrop, 30-10, off the pine, which helped make the margin that much more lopsided.
- Apropos of whatever it may be, Winthrop tried 53 shots on the day. Five players took 42 of those shots. Between the ball sticking, the lack of bench production, and Talford’s foul troubles, it all made for a long afternoon for the visitors.
Selected comments from High Point coach Alan Huss:
Main remarks: “I’m
pleased with the win. They got off to a bad start with Talford getting into
foul trouble. That changes the dynamic of their team dramatically. I thought we
separated while he was off the floor. He’s the most dynamic low-post scorer in
our league, in my opinion. He puts you in so many difficult situations with his
ability to draw fouls and play with such a motor. We showed our guys a lot of
film this week of him being in situations where he’s outnumbered by two and
three guys, outsized by three or four inches at his position. I don’t even know
if he’s the best athlete in the world, but somehow, due to determination and
will, he ends up coming up with those balls. Without him on the floor, I thought
they struggled a bit for a stretch and we capitalized.”
About the bench: “I
thought in the first half, Terry and Laye gave us a really good lift off the
bench. We’re very fortunate to have guys like that that are capable off the
bench. I was really pleased with those guys.”
On the defensive play in the post: “I thought Bodo did a really great job of
guarding without fouling – and (forward) Kimani (Hamilton) for that matter,
too. It’s extremely difficult to guard these guys. They’re number one in the country
at drawing fouls. To guard them and keep them off the foul line – still, we
gave them 26 free throws, but I think they shot 53 in this building a year ago.”
On the rebounding and second-chance points
advantages: “I think our effort has
been really good. We’ve played a couple of these one-day rest games and I
thought we got out-competed (in those games). I think we’ve been the aggressor
and the more competitive team (in other situations). Tonight – we always talk
about rebounding being a great barometer of effort level. Part of that is the
fact that one of the best rebounders in the country – and definitely in our
league – was sitting next to his coach for part of the game, and that helps. We
did a nice job. We rebounded as a group. I thought our guards really rebounded
down. They missed some shots that they’ll probably make at their place. I
thought our guys did a really good job on those 50-50 and 60-40 balls of being
in the right place and going and making those ours.”
HIGH POINT 84, WINTHROP 62
WINTHROP (13-9, 3-4 BIG SOUTH)
Talford 4-5 5-8 13, Doucet 4-11 0-3 9, Jones 2-8 1-2 6,
Johnson 3-8 2-3 10, Harrison 4-10 3-4 14, Baker 1-5 0-0 2, Wilson 0-1 4-4 4,
Diallo 0-0 0-0 0, Hamilton 0-0 0-0 0, Duncomb 1-3 0-0 2, Kamarad 0-1 2-2 2,
Jolly 0-1 0-0 0. Totals 19-53 17-26 62.
HIGH POINT (18-5, 6-2)
Hamilton 5-9 3-3 14, Bodo Bodo 2-4 6-8 10, Giffa 5-8 4-7
14, Johnston 1-3 0-0 3, Williams 5-10 2-2 13, Benham 0-3 0-0 0, Hildebrandt 3-6
0-2 7, Pettiford 2-3 0-1 4, Thiam 4-5 0-1 11, Anderson 3-3 0-1 8, Ibukunoluwa
0-0 0-0 0, Sargiunas 0-1 0-0 0. Totals 30-55 15-25 84.
Halftime: High Point 47-25. 3-Point
goals: High Point 9-21 (Hamilton 1-1 Johnston 1-3, Williams 1-5,
Benham 0-3, Hildebrandt 1-2, Thiam 3-4, Anderson 2-2, Sargiunas 0-1), Winthrop
7-24 (Doucet 1-3, Jones 1-7, Johnson 2-4, Harrison 3-4, Baker 0-3, Wilson 0-1,
Kamarad 0-1, Jolly 0-1). Fouled out: Doucet (WU). Rebounds: High Point 47 (Bodo Bodo
12), Winthrop 27 (Talford 6)). Total fouls: High Point 24, Winthrop
23. Technicals: Anderson (HPU), Doucet (WU).
Points off turnovers: High Point 12, Winthrop 8. Points
in the paint: High Point 34, Winthrop 24. Second-chance
points: High Point 19, Winthrop 6. Fast-break
points: Winthrop 8, High Point 6. Bench
points: High Point 30, Winthrop 10.
Rutgers faithful packs MSG, fuels Scarlet Knights against Michigan State
By Connor Wilson (@Conman_815)
NEW YORK — It’s no secret that the RAC, or as it is now formally known, Jersey Mike’s Arena, holds one of the best home crowd environments in the country.
Rutgers has picked up numerous Top 25 upset wins in Piscataway over the past handful of years, including a win over No. 1 Purdue a couple years back. The fans show out for the Scarlet Knights, even if the product on the court has been subpar at times.
Having two of the top three recruits in the Class of 2024 in Ace Bailey and Dylan Harper, there’s a strong argument to be made that there’s never been as much buzz around the program than in 2024-25 for Steve Pikiell and Rutgers. Nationally ranked in the preseason polls, it has certainly been a roller coaster of a year for the Scarlet Knights, who came into the weekend 10-9 on the season.
“Everyone wants to predict everything before it starts,” Pikiell said. “You have to earn wins in one of the best leagues in the country. There’s still plenty of time left to go on a run here. I think we’re really close.”
If the Scarlet Knights are as close as Pikiell indicates, Saturday marked the biggest home test to date for the struggling Rutgers squad to prove it would turn a corner, hosting eighth-ranked Michigan State. There’s one catch, though.
This game wasn’t in Piscataway, but rather Manhattan, at Madison Square Garden. The Scarlet Knights are no strangers to playing games at The Garden, this marking their seventh appearance in The Mecca of college basketball since Pikiell took over in 2016, and fourth in the regular season.
If you had any doubts that Rutgers Nation wouldn’t make the 40-mile journey to The World’s Most Famous Arena, there was no reason to worry. A sea of nearly 17,500 fans, many of whom clad in scarlet, made the trip to cheer on a Scarlet Knights squad desperate for a signature Big Ten win after starting the new year 2-4.
“It was my first time playing in The Garden,” Bailey said. “I’m thankful for the 17,000 Rutgers fans. It was dope. It was fun.”
“That was a hell of a crowd out there for a college basketball game,” Michigan State head coach Tom Izzo said. “Everybody deserves a little credit for that and the people that put it on. Sometimes, we play here instead of the RAC, and the RAC is harder to play in, but when I looked out, I thought I would see a little more green. That thing was red from a lot of areas.”
The time the Rutgers played at The Garden, the Scarlet Knights defeated the Spartans in 2023, emerging victorious even as Mawot Mag suffered a torn ACL. Luck wasn’t on their side this time around, as they lost to Michigan State, 81-74, on an afternoon where Bailey shot just 4-for-17 from the field and Harper was limited to just 13 minutes due to a sprained ankle he suffered on Monday against Penn State.
“Dylan Harper did everything possible to get back and try and play in this game,” Pikiell said. “He wanted to go. Proud of him for giving it a try. He’s been tough for us.”
Even in defeat, a loss that sent Rutgers to 10-10 on the year in a season with very high expectations, the fans still showed out and were loud from the opening tip. Right off the bat, you’d think it was an NCAA Tournament game from the energy at The Mecca. Bailey drilled a transition trey less than three minutes into the contest to give the Scarlet Knights an early five-point cushion. Based on the crowd reaction, you’d think he hit a game-winning shot in the Final Four if you were unaware of anything else. That wasn’t even the loudest it got in the first half.
Jordan Derkack, who had a game-high 26 points off the bench, knocked down a trailing three from the top of the key to push it back to a one-possession game after the Spartans led by 10. Directly after, Harper picked up a steal on an errant pass and took it down for a tough finish inside to make it a one-point game at 66-65, ensuing a timeout from Izzo, and eruption from the Rutgers faithful.
“I’m a Jersey kid, so playing at MSG today was really cool for me,” Derkack said. “Our fans traveled today and it was loud. They gave us some energy today, especially at the end of the game.”
Once the Spartans ballooned their lead up to as high as 13 in the second half, the fans started to lose energy, with some even trickling out early. A late push, however, anchored by some clutch makes from distance from Derkack and Bailey, never allowed Michigan State to go into true victory formation, trimming it to as close as six after forcing a couple of turnovers. During that run, the crowd got back into it.
“They were giving us energy towards the end,” Bailey said. “When we were trapping and everything, (we were) just feeding off the energy they were giving us. That was a blessing.”
The crowd who remained to the end got back into it, but once it became clear the game was out of reach for good in the closing seconds, the Spartan fans who made the trip became loud and clear.
Not every program has the ability to fill Madison Square Garden the way Rutgers did Saturday. Obviously, not many have the opportunity to host a true home game there, with St. John’s being the only other school who fits that bill, but the crowd showed this is something that has the potential to happen on a more regular basis in the coming years.
“Scheduling is as hard as anything, and getting this venue, this is a busy place,” Pikiell said. “We love to play here and it’s great for us, just the crowd from the last time we played here to this time. Our fans love it and our players love it.”
With having to navigate around the Knicks, Rangers, St. John’s, and whatever number of concerts or shows that go on at The Garden during the winter months, Pikiell’s not wrong that it won’t be easy to get inside the building. But seeing the turnout on Saturday, it should be a priority for the program going forward.
“Hopefully we can continue playing here, maybe for a couple more games if that’s possible,” Pikiell said.
One thing’s for sure. That near-17,500 crowd wasn’t a fluke. Rutgers may be roughly 40 miles away, but even if it’s just one game every couple of years, Madison Square Garden is like a second home.



